Most gallery visitors spend under 30 seconds on a wall text. Here is how to write exhibition texts (from press releases to wall labels) that make those seconds count, with before-and-after examples throughout.
ArtInfoLand EditorialFor Curators, Gallery Directors & Artists12 min read
There is a familiar experience in galleries around the world: a visitor walks up to a wall text, reads the first sentence, and walks away. Not because they lack curiosity or intelligence, but because the sentence did not invite them in. It was written for a peer review panel, or a grant committee, or the artist’s CV — not for a person standing in a room, encountering a work for the first time.
Writing exhibition texts is one of the most underrated skills in the art world. Curators, gallery directors, and artists spend enormous effort on the work itself, on installation decisions, on lighting — and then dash off a wall label in an afternoon. The result is prose that is technically accurate and practically unreadable. This guide covers every format you will encounter, the principles that make them work, and practical before-and-after examples you can use as a template.
An exhibition text is not documentation. It is a threshold — the moment a visitor decides whether to step closer or walk on.
Why Most Exhibition Texts Fail
Before looking at how to write well, it helps to understand the specific failure modes of exhibition writing. They cluster around three habits that are almost universal in institutional contexts.
- Writing for the wrong reader: Exhibition texts are often written with an imagined reader in mind — a curator, an art historian, a grant officer — who is not actually present in the gallery. The real reader is standing up, possibly in a coat, with limited time, bringing whatever background they happen to have. Writing for the imagined reader produces texts full of discipline-specific language that excludes 90% of actual visitors.
- Prioritising comprehensiveness over clarity: Institutional anxiety drives writers to include everything: biographical context, theoretical influences, material information, exhibition history, thematic connections. The result is a text that reads like a compressed catalogue essay. Good exhibition writing makes choices — it selects the one or two things most likely to enrich a visitor’s encounter with the work, and leaves the rest for the catalogue.
- Opening with the wrong sentence: The opening sentence of any exhibition text is the most important piece of writing you will do. In a wall label, it determines whether the visitor reads the second sentence. Most exhibition texts open with the artist’s name, birth year, and nationality — the least interesting information available. The opening should do the opposite: create curiosity, establish a feeling, or pose a question that pulls the reader into the room.
The Four Types of Exhibition Text (and What Each One Must Do)
Exhibition writing is not one thing — it is a family of formats, each with a different purpose, reader, and set of constraints. Treating them as interchangeable is one of the most common mistakes in curatorial practice.
Exhibition Text Formats at a Glance
Press Release
Audience: journalists, art critics, editors. Purpose: earn coverage. Must answer why now, why this, why this artist in the first paragraph. Written in third person. Typically 300–500 words.
Exhibition Statement
Audience: gallery visitors, collectors, general public. Purpose: orient the viewer before (or while) they encounter the work. Should create a question or frame of attention, not summarise the show. Typically 150–250 words.
Wall Label
Audience: visitors standing in front of a specific work. Purpose: deepen the encounter with that one object. Read in 20–40 seconds. Typically 50–100 words, sometimes up to 150 for complex works.
Artist Statement
Audience: variable — could be collectors, curators, open call committees, or the general public. Purpose: convey how the artist thinks about their own work, in their own voice. Typically 150–300 words. The one format written in first person.
80 Wall Label Max: words for a single work
200 Exhibition Statement: Sweet spot for gallery entrance text
400 Press Release: Enough to earn coverage, short enough to be read
Core Principles That Apply to Every Format
Across all four formats, five principles consistently separate the texts that visitors read from the texts they skip.
1. Start With the Work, Not the Context
The most effective exhibition texts begin in the room — with the physical reality of the work, the immediate sensory experience it creates, or the question it raises. Context (biography, theory, art history) is supporting material. It earns its place only after the reader is already engaged.
2. Use Concrete Language
Abstract nouns — temporality, liminal space, materiality, the abject, the gaze — are the default vocabulary of exhibition writing and the clearest signal that a text was not written for a general audience. Every abstract noun can be replaced with a concrete image, a specific action, or a sensory detail. The resulting sentence is almost always more interesting.
3. One Idea Per Text
Wall labels can hold one idea. Exhibition statements can hold two, generously. Press releases can hold three if they are clearly organised. The instinct to include more produces texts that communicate less. Choose the most interesting thing about this work or this exhibition, and give it room to land.
4. Write the Way Visitors Think
Visitors encounter works with mixed preparation: some have researched the artist in advance; many have arrived knowing nothing. Exhibition texts work when they meet that second group without condescending to the first. Write as if you are speaking to an intelligent friend who happens not to be an art professional. This is not a lower standard — it is a more demanding one.
5. Read It Standing Up
The final test for any wall label is physical: print it, tape it to a wall at eye level, and read it while standing. What felt like a reasonable length at a desk often feels exhausting in a gallery. If you want to stop reading, so will your visitor.
Before & After: The Wall Label
The following examples use a fictional work — a large-scale photographic series by an artist exploring displacement and collective memory — to demonstrate the transformation in practice.
Before
Employing a methodology of archival excavation and site-specific photographic intervention, this series interrogates the relationship between collective memory, spatial dislocation, and the construction of post-colonial identity. Working across multiple geographies, the artist questions the normative frameworks through which cultural heritage is mediated and commodified, foregrounding the affective residue of displacement as both subject and formal strategy. Chromogenic prints, variable dimensions.
After
These photographs were taken in buildings that no longer exist. The artist spent three years returning to sites of demolished homes across four countries, photographing the light and marks left behind — the outline of a picture frame on a wall, a door handle worn smooth by a generation of hands. What you see is what remained, one day before demolition. Chromogenic prints, dimensions variable.
What changed: The “after” version opens with a concrete, surprising fact. It uses sensory detail — the picture frame outline, the worn door handle — to create emotional presence. “Chromogenic prints” moves to the end. Every abstract noun (“post-colonial identity,” “affective residue”) is replaced with a specific image or action. The word count drops from 77 to 72 while communicating far more.
Before & After: The Exhibition Statement
The entrance statement is the highest-stakes text in an exhibition. It sets the frame for everything a visitor sees. Below, the same imaginary group show — works exploring water, erosion, and climate — in two versions.
Before
This exhibition brings together five international artists whose practices engage with questions of ecological temporality, the politics of natural resource management, and the phenomenological experience of environmental transformation. Through diverse media including video, installation, photography, and sculpture, the works in this exhibition explore the intersection of human and non-human agency in the context of accelerating climate change, inviting visitors to reflect on their own relationship to the natural world.
After
Water moves differently now. It comes too fast, or it doesn’t come at all. The five artists in this exhibition have been watching: a coastline in Senegal that retreats a metre each year, a river in Bolivia that no longer reaches the sea, a reservoir in Spain that surfaces a drowned village whenever drought is severe enough. These works don’t argue about climate. They show you what it looks like from the ground.
What changed: The “after” version opens with a short declarative sentence that creates unease before the visitor has seen a single work. It uses three specific, real-feeling details rather than broad themes. The closing line defines the exhibition’s position without using the word “explore.” Abstract categories (“ecological temporality,” “human and non-human agency”) become disappeared coastlines and a drowned village.
Before & After: The Artist Statement
Artist statements are notoriously difficult to write — partly because artists are too close to their own practice, partly because the format rewards a kind of careful vagueness that makes reviewers comfortable and readers sleepy. Here is an example from a sculptor working with industrial salvage materials.
Before
My practice is concerned with the materiality of industrial decay and the way in which discarded objects carry traces of human labour and social history. I am interested in the transformative potential of salvaged materials and the ways in which the act of recontextualisation can expose hidden narratives embedded within everyday industrial detritus. My work sits at the intersection of sculpture, installation, and social archaeology, questioning dominant narratives of progress and obsolescence.
After
I collect things that were made to last and didn’t. Steel brackets from a factory that closed in 2003. Conveyor belt sections. A press mould for a car part no longer manufactured. Each object holds a specific moment when someone decided it was no longer worth keeping. I’m interested in that decision — who makes it, and what it costs. My sculptures are built from these materials without concealing what they were. I want the history to stay visible.
What changed: The “after” version is written in a specific, personal voice — not a distanced third-person perspective masquerading as first person. It lists three actual objects rather than “industrial detritus.” It identifies a specific question the artist is pursuing (“who makes it, and what it costs”) rather than a general thematic territory. The word count barely changes; the clarity changes entirely.
Before & After: The Press Release
Press releases have an additional constraint: they are competing with dozens of others in a journalist’s inbox. The opening paragraph determines whether the rest gets read. Most press releases open with the gallery name, exhibition title, and dates — exactly the information a journalist can find in three seconds online.
Before
Gallery Name is pleased to announce the opening of Threshold, a solo exhibition of new works by [Artist Name], on view from [Date] through [Date]. The exhibition features fifteen new paintings developed over a three-year period, exploring the artist’s ongoing engagement with questions of perception, colour theory, and the psychological dimensions of pictorial space. An opening reception will be held on [Date] from 6–9pm. The exhibition is accompanied by a fully illustrated catalogue with an essay by [Critic Name].
After
For the past three years, [Artist Name] has been painting rooms that feel wrong. Not obviously distorted — the proportions are plausible, the light is coherent — but something in the spatial logic refuses to resolve. Threshold, opening [Date] at [Gallery Name], brings together fifteen of these paintings for the first time. They arrived out of a period of prolonged illness during which the artist spent months in spaces that felt simultaneously familiar and unreachable. An illustrated catalogue with an essay by [Critic Name] accompanies the exhibition.
What changed: The “after” version opens with a description of what the work actually feels like — “rooms that feel wrong” — before naming anything. It introduces the artist’s biography only when it adds meaning (the illness context explains the work). The practical information (dates, catalogue) moves to the end, where it functions as reference rather than lead. A journalist reading this has a story angle before they finish the first paragraph.
A Practical Checklist Before You Publish
Pre-Publication Self-Edit
- Read the first sentence aloud. Does it create curiosity, or does it state a fact you could find in any CV?
- Underline every abstract noun. For each one, ask: can this be replaced with a concrete image, action, or specific detail?
- Count the ideas. A wall label should have one. An exhibition statement should have two at most. If you have more, cut.
- Check the opening sentence: does it start with the artist’s name? If so, rewrite it.
- Remove every instance of “explore,” “interrogate,” “negotiate,” “engage with,” and “question.” Replace with what the work actually does.
- Read it standing up, at the distance a visitor would stand. If you want to stop reading, rewrite.
- Ask someone outside the art world to read it. Where do they slow down or lose the thread? That is where the text needs work.
- Check word count against format. A wall label over 100 words is a wall label that will not be read.
On Jargon: A Specific List
The following phrases appear in exhibition texts so frequently that they have become invisible — and meaningless. Each is listed with a suggested replacement strategy.
Jargon Replacement Guide
- “Explores the tension between X and Y” — Say what the tension actually is, or what it produces in the work.
- “Questions dominant narratives” — Name the specific narrative being questioned, and describe how the work does it.
- “Liminal space / threshold / in-between” — Describe what the visitor physically experiences, not the theoretical category it belongs to.
- “The politics of the body” — Whose body? What politics? Specify.
- “Invites the viewer to reflect” — Describe what the work shows, does, or withholds. The reflection follows; you don’t need to announce it.
- “Practice-based research” — Say what the artist was actually investigating and how the work embodies it.
- “Post-colonial / decolonial” — Only use these terms if you are going to explain specifically what they mean in relation to this work. Otherwise, say what the work does instead.
- “Playful yet serious” — Pick one and commit. Or describe the specific moment where the register shifts.
What Good Exhibition Writing Looks Like in Practice
The Tate’s wall labels are a consistently strong example of the form. Their writing team regularly replaces disciplinary language with sensory or narrative openings. The Museum of Modern Art has publicly committed to plain-language standards in their labels. The Serpentine Gallery’s press materials tend to lead with the artist’s perspective or process rather than curatorial framing, often the more interesting angle.
None of these institutions have abandoned critical seriousness. What they have abandoned is the habit of performing critical seriousness through language that readers cannot enter. The result is texts that serve both the institution’s reputation and the visitor’s experience; which are, ultimately, the same goal.
Clarity is not the enemy of complexity. It is the condition for it. A visitor who understands the first sentence will stay for the difficult second one.
Good exhibition writing is a skill that improves with practice and with specific feedback. Read your texts alongside texts from institutions you admire. Ask colleagues from outside curatorial practice to mark every phrase they find opaque. Keep a running file of wall labels that stopped you in a gallery and study what they did in that first sentence.
The work deserves readers. Good writing is what gets them there.
List Your Exhibition on a Platform Artists Already Use
ArtInfoLand connects galleries, residencies, and arts organisations with a global community of artists and curators across 85+ countries. Open calls, exhibitions, and opportunities; listed where practitioners are actively looking.
